Directed by:
Pierre MorelCinematography:
Michel AbramowiczComposer:
Nathaniel MéchalyCast:
Liam Neeson, Maggie Grace, Leland Orser, Jon Gries, David Warshofsky, Holly Valance, Katie Cassidy, Xander Berkeley, Olivier Rabourdin, Gérard Watkins (more)Plots(1)
When his estranged teenage daughter (Maggie Grace) is kidnapped in Paris, a former spy (Neeson) sets out to find her at any cost. Relying on his special skills, he tracks down the ruthless gang that abducted her and launches a one-man war to bring them to justice and rescue his daughter. (official distributor synopsis)
Videos (3)
Reviews (12)
A bitter tale about a paranoid dad who kills a couple of ugly Arabs and Albanians on a trip to Paris, so that his princess’s luck doesn't run out and she doesn't end up on the gerontophile stick of a wicked rich man. From a rather illogical and sometimes sentimental spectacle, Morel and Neeson create an incredible adrenaline rush full of brilliant action and rough one-liners. I haven't seen such perfectly edited and frantic action for a long time, and they use almost exclusively very economical choreographies. One then forgets that the story doesn't really make sense at all and is only there as decoration.
()
Perhaps the best European action flick I know. What Pierre Morel does here is unmatched. Liam Neeson is flawless, the setting is as raw and authentic as it can be, and the action is so fast, raw, and dynamic that it takes your breath away. The atmosphere is wonderfully, with captivatingly cold characters, and one of the few action films where the “toughness” is truly tangible and completely believable (phone call, dens, party, auction, boat). A masterful gem of pure action and a future classic in a few years.
()
Steven Seagal, Jason Bourne, Jack Bauer. At least two of those names show up in pretty much every review of this film and it’s not a misguided comparison at all. Liam Neeson is your typical Bauer-like father that travels to save his daughter in a Bourne fashion, beating up his enemies à la Seagal. The script isn’t bursting with originality, the only thing that can surprise the viewer is what kind of coincidence will be used next for the hero to go a step further – but nobody watches action films because of the plot. The relentless and incorrect liquidation of Albanians and other subversive beings was a lot of fun, therefore, 4*.
()
About the movie "96 Hours", I heard only good things, but still I thought that there couldn't be anything that unique about an action thriller. But there is. And two words are enough to describe it - Liam Neeson. Liam Neeson has become an incredible action hero in his old age. Thanks to his charisma, we watch a man who we can fall in love with, but we still don't know what this sixty-year-old can do when it comes to action. He is incredibly good and believable. You are watching someone who could really be the action hero of the new age. A family man who has secrets, not equipped with muscles, but with abilities that make him the most dangerous killer. So what if he's a veteran? When a person has it in them, they simply have it. You believe everything Liam says. His calmness when he listens to his daughter being kidnapped in a live broadcast shows that you are simply watching someone who is a total professional. You are with him and you cheer for him. This is a great positive aspect of the movie, which surprisingly doesn't rely on a complicated plot. But Liam makes it a completely different spectacle. His actions are logical, and even though you know how it will probably end, you still wait to see what will happen and how he will actually reach his daughter. The fact that the authors chose Paris for the film helped a bit (it's not surprising since the script was written by Luc Besson), but the location is not decisive in this case. It could easily be Prague, since we're at it. "96 Hours" doesn't bring a plot that will amaze you, but you will meet a hero who will keep you in suspense and hope throughout the whole time, hoping that he will find his daughter and that everything will turn out as well as it can. He just has to kick all the scumbags' asses. Unfortunately, I missed the sequel in the cinema - I didn't want to see it until I saw the first one - but I'm afraid that Besson sat down at the table again just to squeeze a little more out of the successful franchise. However, I don't believe in its quality much, and as I find out from the opinions of critics and viewers, my concerns are justified. But the first one is a masterpiece of modern (meaning contemporary) action film. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/11/sahara-stormbreaker-syriana-andelsky.html
()
Without Neeson, this would be an incredibly run-of-the-mill film, one that has been seen plenty of times before. But with his presence on screen, the film seems to get a second wind and immediately provides entertainment. The French production is pleasing, with its distinctive style of crime thrillers evident at every turn. Here, Neeson kick-started his career as the older guy you don’t want to disturb from his routine, or he’ll deal with you like a small, insignificant fool. Watching him search for his kidnapped daughter in Paris is thoroughly enjoyable, and you easily root for him to kick those bad guys' asses. It’s just a pity that there wasn’t a main, charismatic villain; this aspect was noticeably missing. The action is fairly decent, though I wouldn’t go so far as to claim it’s one of the best action movies. The epileptic editing style akin to Bourne could have been avoided during the fights and shootouts. The film definitely entertained me, and I enjoyed it, but in terms of the genre, it’s not really a revolutionary viewing experience. Definitely not. I rate it 7.5/10.
()
Ads