Directed by:
Petr ZelenkaScreenplay:
Petr ZelenkaCinematography:
Alexander ŠurkalaComposer:
Janez DovčCast:
Kryštof Hádek, Jiří Mádl, Veronika Khek Kubařová, Zuzana Fialová, Richard Stanke, Helena Dvořáková, Miroslav Hanuš, Jiří Štrébl, Kristýna Frejová (more)Plots(1)
Law is the search for justice, but it sometimes wanders in a labyrinth of its own dogmas, other times it applies itself purposefully. Isn’t it time for “direct action”? Chemist and drone navigator Pavel decides to punish the crimes with his own hand, but he probably has no idea just how heavy the moment of truth is in the end. (Summer Film School)
(more)Videos (2)
Reviews (7)
Kryštof Hádek as the Ingenious Droneman Don Quixote de la Bickle and Jiří Mádl as Skymaster Twerp in a film by Petr Zelenka and his friends: Who’s the Bigger Dick Here? It's an interesting portrayal of how the sense of justice is now often perceived as something that ties its owner to naivety, helplessness, and effectively stupidity. However, to make it more believable, the characters shouldn't be mere caricatures, and the whole thing shouldn't give the impression that the USS Abraham Lincoln is maneuvering in the small Czech pond. I'll leave Mádl's further cretinous variation of spoken expression without comment; the creators wanted it that way, but next time, I’d kindly ask for subtitles for him, just like for Russian and English.
()
An ambitious Czech film that tries to break out of the mold and present something quite unusual for our region. I fully appreciate such a bold move, but the result remains quite mixed for me. The idea of incorporating U.S. politics from the Bush era into a local film was intriguing, but I could have envisioned a more refined execution. Kryštof Hádek and Jiří Mádl, excel, and thanks to them, Droneman didn't fall into the dubious realm of mediocrity. I also liked that it was difficult to predict which direction director/writer Petr Zelenka would take; there were countless possible paths, so kudos for that. The climactic ending, with Dick Cheney arriving in Prague, had its moments, I'll admit. Overall... an interesting mix of genres, but one viewing was enough for me. For me, it’s 6/10.
()
Droneman is a very strange film, in a good and not so good way. I was definitely intrigued by the rather unorthodox premise by Czech standards, but its impact is (in my opinion) slightly loses in the execution, which offers both strong and bizarre scenes. I can understand the intentions of the makers, who wanted to portray (in)justice and (mis)use of technology, but at times it felt too chaotic and stilted. For example, I found it strange how easily Pavel could get to where he needed to go without anyone being taken aback by his dodgy looks, and the scenes with Veronika Khek Kubařová seemed completely unnecessary. The film is certainly not without courage to show things that are not spoken about out loud, but I had the impression that it could have been done better.
()
Just seeing that a new Peter Zelenka film is coming to theaters is enough for me, that's all I care about and I know I'm going to see it. At most I'll allow myself one trailer, but no more; I don't read interviews, I don't check up on anything, I want to be surprised.... and then I'm surprised every time. Droneman is another proof of how great a world-class filmmaker Petr Zelenka is. He takes a subject that touches him deeply, mixes reality with ingenious fiction, and creates a world that literally draws the viewer in and then lets them watch and make up their own minds. Droneman is just that – believable and yet surprising. A Czech film, but with a world view and scope,which it simply isn't afraid of. Petr Zelenka doesn't compromise and makes the film the way he wants to make it, and if the audience is on the same wavelength, they will enjoy this grim, ugly story about the fact that when it comes to down to it you actually have only two choices (which Lenka.Vílka beautifully captured in her comment). The story is as deadly serious as it is absurd, as bleak as it is hopeful, as full of exclamation points as it is of question marks. In the theater, I felt sorry for the audience, who were amused by "Madl talks weird" and "Hádek is weird", grasping at every hint of a joke (actually a pretty cynical smirk) so they could finally laugh again, and walking away shaking their heads at the closing credits. Too bad. The film deals, among other things, with the fact that the Czech courts can't handle the world's problems because they haven't grown into it yet. And it's the same with Droneman – it won't appeal to immature viewers. Too bad and good for them at the same time.
()
Droneman confirms Zelenka’s position as a standout in Czech cinema, who, like the protagonist of his latest film, will be seen by some as an oddball, though he makes our insular vision of the world, which concerns both Czech cinema and the current crisis of values and ideas in Western society, clear to us through the purity and unambiguity of his values. At its core, Droneman is a paradox, as it is a reflection of today from the point of view of a person who does not fit into this time, but who can all the better express the nonsense and paradoxes of the period. Based on the various responses to and reflections on the film, it may seem that Zelenka is unable to effectively communicate with today’s viewers. However, that is not because he is not a capable filmmaker, but because he relies on certain values and their specific meanings. But our current period is characterised by the absolute devaluation of concepts, where grand words like justice, legitimacy, democracy, reason, pride and honour can no longer be perceived on their own at face value. We have to interpret their meaning according to who says them and in what context, based on which they can have completely different meanings and implications. Zelenka thus brings into this world of ambiguity a provocative film that is simultaneously unambiguous and absolute in terms of the filmmaker’s opinions, but dangerously open to viewers. Like the intellectually pure ideas at its core, the film can be appropriated by people across the spectrum of opinion, from conservatives to radicals, who can take it as confirmation of their views. As a story about an individual acting in opposition to the compromises of society, Droneman makes Fight Club seem as if it doesn't contain any unsettling elements at all by comparison, as it relies solely on viewers to correctly interpret it thanks to the fact its ideas are unshakable (though we know that even Fight Club in its real form has paradoxically become a talisman for incels and radicals who simply ignore its final third). In this display of goodwill (or, from today’s perspective, naïveté), Droneman proves to be a meaningful, albeit problematic and exploitable, reflection of the current period. It shows us how terribly confusing the present is for someone who believes in the original value of ideals that have been misused and devalued by political populism, personal opportunism and radical fanaticism. At the same time, the film sticks out like a sore thumb in the context of Czech cinema, which is mired in self-importance and provincialism and only pats itself on the back. Zelenka presents viewers with a mainstream genre film that is set in the present, which serves as its central them, and directly in the narrative thematises the idea that we do not have to concern ourselves only with our own past or the carefree, blurry present, but that we can aspire to something more. That this description is a revelation and not the norm in a film industry that produces more than sixty feature-length movies per year is a telling account of the state of that industry. Just as Buttoners, which also recorded the ethos of its time, particularly fatefulness and existential anxiety in the face of the end of the millennium, Droneman will remain a memento of the age in which it was created, albeit a paradoxical memento.
()
(less)
(more)
Ads