Underworld

A film that is the biggest disappointment of the year for me personally. The fact that the touted story of Romeo and Juliet in the world of vampires and werewolves never happens wouldn't matter so much, but an action horror film with entirely unimaginative and static action and without a single thrilling moment is already a problem. On top of that, the acting is mediocre, the make-up effects are crap, the script, besides being pretty simple, has tons of logical errors and the direction is very subpar. It's a shame, because with its premise it could have been so much more. (2003-12-05)

Along with Ginger Snaps, Underworld is one of those series featuring monsters that I can't get enough of, despite my mediocre rating. The first episode has a really well done and atmospheric opening, including an introduction to the mythology of vampires and werewolves that draws the viewer into the story. I liked the hierarchy and the overall concept of the world of vampires, who, compared to werewolves (or here so nobly called Lycans), seemed more "aristocratic" – for example, covens and awakening elders. Like more than one user here, I have to comment on some of the illogical or even downright silly scenes that occurred from time to time in the film, such as the floor being shot through with a pistol (overall, Selene had a lot of rough bullets as they pierced the floor and walls at rest), the shooting sequence (a ton of bullets politely losing all the way against a few shots), or (possible SPOILER! ) the final duel between Viktor and Michael, which at times kind of reminded me of an awkwardly done game of strings and flying through the air (end of possible SPOILER!). But not to be a detractor here, I have to give credit to the decently done cliffhanger, which set the stage for the sequel, and also the decent soundtrack. It's a film that I like despite these visible flaws, which is why I like to come back to it from time to time. (2016-09-03)

This was alright. Kate in the corset and latex is decent at least. The purposefully colorized black-and-blue-and-white film is pleasing to the eye, but that's about all there is to say about it. Dramatically, it’s too straightforward, so the only films it can beat on points in its genre are the infamous Twilight saga films. (2012-07-31)

When you first read the film's premise, you might hesitate at the idea of a battle between vampires and werewolves and think to yourself, "No way, I'm not watching that at all." Don't make the same mistake I did for a few years. Len Wiseman is a solid craftsman who knows what he's doing, and we've already seen proof of that (Die Hard 4 was an action hit). There was no problem with his direction. The story has a few flaws, but the presentation of the mythology itself was top-notch. The script is weaker, and sometimes you'll find illogical character behavior, but it seems to me that lately, the script isn't always the top priority. You just can't overthink everything happening on screen, but if you enjoy the mysterious execution with a likable main heroine, you'll end up liking the film. For a fairly low budget, the special effects were great, which really surprised me (it's nice to see that today, you can make a blockbuster for a reasonable price). The use of colors benefited the film, and I wouldn't have liked full colors, which would have somewhat killed the atmosphere. The action is the best aspect, and the vampire vs. lycan fights have something going for them. We'll see what the sequel brings, and then another sequel, and after that another... It's a long series, so I'm slightly worried that the quality won't hold up throughout. I give it 71%. (2017-08-14)

I'm not saying it's a masterpiece, but in concept and treatment, Underworld certainly doesn't fall into the category of a purely "B" film: The sets, the art direction, the music, and the excellent action are the main pluses of this film, which otherwise flounders on its script. Underworld is far from being a sophisticated and intelligent vampire saga, but I was not bored, quite the opposite – I had a great time. A weaker 4 stars. (2009-07-26)