Kursk

The sailor characters could have been further developed other than through clichéd family ties to their wives and children, but the admirals on the surface richly compensate for that with their varied motivations and political backgrounds. Colin Firth is as well suited to the captain character as Tom Hanks. Not to mention the communist Soviet admiral played by Max von Sidow, who turns in a goosebump-inducing performance. The casting in general is very well done here; I hadn’t realised until now how much Schoenaerts and Seydoux have “Russian faces”. But what I appreciate most about Kursk is its thematic balance and complexity. To the same extent that Kursk is about the tragedy of men under water, it is also about the political conflict above the surface and the absurdity of the Soviets’ approach to the event. It’s about a rotten system that betrayed its own people because of false ideas. The second Chernobyl in 14 years. The film gains its key value from the skirting of the story through a young boy, the son of one of the submariners, and his understanding of the situation and his reaction to it. (2021-01-06)

Movies about submarines usually bore me, which fortunately I can't say about The Command. Vinterberg managed to record the infamous story of a great human tragedy, for which the Russian Admiralty is to blame, quite comprehensively and very realistically. I was infinitely distressed at the thought of how all those young men must have felt as they deliberately waited for death in a badly damaged submarine. Their families, losing their last vestiges of hope with each passing hour after the accident, probably need not be mentioned. Matthias Schoenaerts fought for survival at the bottom of the Barents Sea so fiercely and convincingly that I secretly hoped for his rescue. (80%) (2021-07-01)

I remember the TV coverage of the disaster and the film captures it faithfully, including the injection of a sedative to one of the distraught mothers. Anyway, one thing is clear from the film: if something similar happened to any of the NATO armies that the local Putin trolls spit on as much as they can, their leadership might break ranks to save these boys. But the Russian military leadership has a different yardstick, the ‘there’s plenty of us’ rule. In Russia, human life has never been worth anything, ever since the Battle of Stalingrad, when they deployed young unarmed boys to the front lines with firing squads at their backs. As Papa Stalin used to say: “The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic.” Russia, a land of unlimited possibilities... (2019-06-03)

The portrayal of the character of the sailors is poor and two-dimensional, even in the tense “it’s not there” moments. The portrayal of the life in a submarine and the accident is, on the other hand, brilliant. It’s dark, claustrophobic, chilling and without pathos. Vinterberg successfully reconstructs an historical event about the life and death of the sailors of a nuclear submarine and the main thing missing is, paradoxically, a bit of life and energy. (2019-04-08)

The film's premise is excellent, but the execution faltered in places. I believe that entrusting the film to a different, perhaps more experienced director might have resulted in a better outcome. However, I could also be wrong. Thomas Vinterberg tackled a tragedy from recent history and presented it skillfully, but that was about it. Emotionally, it had some impact for most of its runtime, but I didn't develop a strong connection with the crew of the submarine from the perspective of a viewer. Yes, the main character was given ample screen time (it would have been surprising if he hadn’t), but this was not the case for the other members. As a creator, I might have considered giving these sailors more screen time, as they should be the focal point of the film, and also developing their characters more deeply to bring the characters closer to us. In terms of acting performances, I have no complaints; Matthias Schoenaerts did an excellent job in his role, and Max von Sydow shone in a supporting role. The film is technically well-made and feels very authentic, but don’t look for much more than that in it. I give it 66%. (2019-07-08)