Kursk

The film's premise is excellent, but the execution faltered in places. I believe that entrusting the film to a different, perhaps more experienced director might have resulted in a better outcome. However, I could also be wrong. Thomas Vinterberg tackled a tragedy from recent history and presented it skillfully, but that was about it. Emotionally, it had some impact for most of its runtime, but I didn't develop a strong connection with the crew of the submarine from the perspective of a viewer. Yes, the main character was given ample screen time (it would have been surprising if he hadn’t), but this was not the case for the other members. As a creator, I might have considered giving these sailors more screen time, as they should be the focal point of the film, and also developing their characters more deeply to bring the characters closer to us. In terms of acting performances, I have no complaints; Matthias Schoenaerts did an excellent job in his role, and Max von Sydow shone in a supporting role. The film is technically well-made and feels very authentic, but don’t look for much more than that in it. I give it 66%. (2019-07-08)

I remember the TV coverage of the disaster and the film captures it faithfully, including the injection of a sedative to one of the distraught mothers. Anyway, one thing is clear from the film: if something similar happened to any of the NATO armies that the local Putin trolls spit on as much as they can, their leadership might break ranks to save these boys. But the Russian military leadership has a different yardstick, the ‘there’s plenty of us’ rule. In Russia, human life has never been worth anything, ever since the Battle of Stalingrad, when they deployed young unarmed boys to the front lines with firing squads at their backs. As Papa Stalin used to say: “The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic.” Russia, a land of unlimited possibilities... (2019-06-03)

The portrayal of the character of the sailors is poor and two-dimensional, even in the tense “it’s not there” moments. The portrayal of the life in a submarine and the accident is, on the other hand, brilliant. It’s dark, claustrophobic, chilling and without pathos. Vinterberg successfully reconstructs an historical event about the life and death of the sailors of a nuclear submarine and the main thing missing is, paradoxically, a bit of life and energy. (2019-04-08)

A European drama about supra-multinational theme. It is true that if it was filmed by the Russians or if the actors were speaking Russian the movie would get a new dimension and it would definitely add some authenticity. On the other hand, I would be afraid that the story might end up as one big demagogy so eventually Thomas Vinterberg is for me the ideal choice. Not only he filmed the movie in a quite good way, the movie even featured some of the best European actors and therefore it was worth watching. That’s good enough for me. It doesn’t make you feel as suffocated as Das boot might and the number of explosions and special effects is lesser than if this film had been filmed by the Americans. On the other hand, there is a greater emphasis on relationships and the story line of Léa Seydoux is literally amazing. Not to mention what happened in the submarine. (2019-09-16)

I'm not a big fan of submarines and the Navy, so I went into this film more out of curiosity and it wasn't bad. The explosion in Kursk is filmed decently and the following submarine survival drama is filmed entertainingly though it definitely could have been grittier as well as more gripping. I wasn't bored but I'm not the target audience. However, for fans of submarines and movies based on true events, I recommend it. 60%. (2019-05-14)