Directed by:
Guillermo del ToroCinematography:
Dan LaustsenComposer:
Nathan JohnsonCast:
Bradley Cooper, Cate Blanchett, Toni Collette, Willem Dafoe, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, Ron Perlman, Mary Steenburgen, David Strathairn, Mark Povinelli (more)Plots(1)
When charismatic but down-on-his-luck Stanton Carlisle (Bradley Cooper) endears himself to clairvoyant Zeena (Toni Collette) and her has-been mentalist husband Pete (David Strathairn) at a traveling carnival, he crafts what seems to be a golden ticket to success. The more he uses his newly acquired knowledge to grift the wealthy elite of 1940s New York society, the more his ambition grows. Soon, with the virtuous Molly (Rooney Mara) loyally by his side, Stanton plots to con a dangerous tycoon (Richard Jenkins) with the aid of a mysterious psychiatrist (Cate Blanchett), who might turn out to be his most formidable opponent yet. (Google Play)
(more)Videos (5)
Reviews (11)
This time, form wins over content, as the atmosphere is superb and the direction is meticulously detailed, but the story didn't quite grab me by the heart. The first (roughly) circus half was great, and since I didn't know anything about the plot (even the short official distributor blurb here is actually a spoiler), I was curious to see where it was all going. Unfortunately, this eventually led to a not so interesting second and third act, in which almost everything was suddenly expected, including the beautifully vicious ending. I'm a bit disappointed because I really like Guillermo Del Toro and he got a dream cast for Nightmare Alley, but at the same time I'm not too disappointed. P.S.. Bradley Cooper's hero is a downright Lovecraftian character, and I' d like to see some of that Cthulhu next time.
()
The critics are singing the praises, but I wonder if it's not a bit of a pose. I like Guillermo del Toro, but it turns out I think it's only within the fantasy genre. Nightmare Alley is nothing more than a drawn out 150 minute tedious borefest with some pretty nice sets and fine actors, but the rest of it is very bad. The first hour is quite watchable and offers solid visuals led by a traveling circus and freak show, but once the plot moves forward in time, del Toro started to lose me until he lost me completely towards the end. Plot-wise, there's not much to stand on and the entire runtime drags on in stereotype form without any major emotion, action or suspense and with each passing minute you just wait for the film to actually start, only to find out towards the end that it just hasn't. And then I don't know what to rate - big names are not enough to be satisfied.
()
Looking at Guillermo del Toro's filmography, I'd say Nightmare Alley might just be his most layered work yet. Set in the 1940s, it starts off as an occult drama within the world of a circus, only to morph into a full-blown noir in the second half. The cinematography is stunning, and the atmosphere thickens perfectly, suggesting del Toro's usual supernatural touch, which he intriguingly subdues with stark pragmatism as the film progresses. It's a bit unexpected, but with stellar performances, this film stands out as one of the most intriguing releases in recent memory.
()
An epochal experience. It's very nice that we get such an ideal film even in the cloud of this year's Oscar nominations. Great stuff is drawn from William Lindsay Gresham's novel "Nightmare Alley" (1946), which had already proven to be a novelty when it was first adapted in 1947. Stylistically, it is a treat with classic film punctuation, the production design is absolutely art deco and the decadence of a circus setting and a wicked big city are combined. What more could you want? The acting roles, which are a given: Cooper, Blanchett, Dafoe, Mara, Collette... A decade earlier, Water for Elephants was a similar treat. And on TV, maybe Season 4 of AHS or the unfinished HBO series Carnivàle.
()
A rare oddity. Del Toro finally closed his usual toy store and made his most mature film in a long time, if not ever. Nightmare Alley is a dark neo-noir beautiful ride full of strange individuals, obscured motivations and human hardships, all in a phenomenal, delectable visual stylisation, which is elaborated to the smallest detail. It is not a particularly pleasant viewing and some passages drag a bit too much, but it has its highlights and there are quite a lot of them. Surprisingly, the violence can be as intense and experiential as some of the dialogue and interactions between the main characters. Bradley Cooper in an unusual role, which he tackled more than competently.
()
Ads