Directed by:
Quentin TarantinoScreenplay:
Quentin TarantinoCinematography:
Andrzej SekulaCast:
Harvey Keitel, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Chris Penn, Steve Buscemi, Lawrence Tierney, Randy Brooks, Kirk Baltz, Edward Bunker, Quentin Tarantino, David Steen (more)VOD (1)
Plots(1)
Six unacquainted professional criminals are brought together by a veteran thief to execute an intricately planned diamond robbery. (official distributor synopsis)
Videos (1)
Reviews (9)
Before Quentin Tarantino's arrival, either generous, academically precise gangster films were being made, such as The Godfather series or Once Upon a Time in the West, or cheap and terrible B-movies that couldn't be taken seriously. Tarantino brought new energy, vulgarity, and interesting characters to the crime genre - his characters are a collection of various psychopaths and scoundrels of the worst kind - and above all, he brought back the entertainment value and attractiveness to crime films for film fans. Elements typical of his style are present in his debut - the alternating timelines, dialogue-driven scenes, violence portrayed as entertainment, and a provocatively pop-cultural mix of music motifs. In his beginnings, Tarantino worked to create a significant revival and I truly like his early films, unlike his recent works. If I can criticize anything about Reservoir Dogs, it would be its rather short runtime, as it could easily have been half an hour longer, and the audience could have gotten to know the fates of the remaining members of the gang. An inexpensive film that scored points with its excellent casting and provocative content. Overall impression: 90%.
()
A gangster movie that's more about dialogue than guns isn't really my thing. The film is so talky that you don't manage to notice half of the things let alone absorb them, the actors are unknown, uninteresting and second rate, the wisecracks were neither funny nor cool – Quentin Tarantino clearly has a different sense of humour than I do, and I haven't seen a film that bored me at a mere 99 minutes in a long time. 50% for the director and for his craftsmanship, but never more torture for me.
()
I've seen the film several times, and every time, I feel like I discover something new, or rather, I realize even more how well thought out the entire screenplay is. While Tarantino is often praised for his dialogues, he can be equally praised for the entire structure of the story, which is absolutely brilliant, despite the simplicity of the whole premise of the messed-up heist. A master is simply a master.
()
Paradoxically, Reservoir Dogs was my "last Tarantino movie". I got exactly what I expected, and given that those expectations were high, I found absolutely no fault with it. A typical Quentin mosaic, great music, dialogue (it's just cool) and a foreshadowing of future Pulp Fiction or Jackie Brown style of flicks to come.
()
Back in the day, I rated this movie highly, and after revisiting it today, I wouldn't change a thing about it. Many genres come to mind, but at its core, it's essentially a chamber movie. With almost all the characters (except one cop in uniform) falling on the negative spectrum, I didn't really have anyone to root for. Yet, it gave me the freedom to mentally pick what kind of ending I wanted for each bastard. Mr. Blonde, being a murderous psychopath, would have gotten the worst from me because I've got zero sympathy for that type. It seems Tarantino's films don't lose their appeal for me over time, and a big part of that is thanks to the stellar cast. In this movie, it really clicked, and I thoroughly enjoyed all the dialogue and the performances of the star-studded cast. / Lesson learned: If you enter a slippery slope, don't act surprised when you start slipping.
()
Ads